Browsed by
Month: September 2017



Arrest is one of the lawful methods of securing the attendance of an accused person in court. It is also the most drastic method. Section 38 of the Criminal Procedure Act states that methods of securing attendance of an accused person include:

  1. Arrest;
  2. Summons;
  3. Written notice; and
  4. Indictment.

The basic principle of South African criminal procedure is that of access to courts, in accordance with section 34 of the Constitution.

When can a person be arrested?

A person may be arrested either on the strength of a warrant of arrest or when a police officer witnesses a person committing an offence or has probable cause to believe that a person was involved in the commission of a crime.

What rights does a person have when arrested?

If someone has, or is in the process of being arrested, they have the right to be informed of the charges on which they are being arrested. Most importantly, they have the right to remain silent, to be informed promptly of such right and the consequences of not remaining silent. Any information uttered or willingly given to an officer may be used against them in court.

  1. A person has the right to be brought before a court as soon as reasonably possible, but not later than 48 hours after being arrested.
  2. If the period of 48 hours expires outside ordinary court hours or on a day which is not an ordinary court day, the accused must be brought before a court not later than the end of the first following court day.

After an arrest a person will, more often than not, be detained at a police station. In detention, you may be searched. You may however not be searched without your consent and a person of the same sex should conduct the search.

What rights does a person have when being detained?

When being detained, a person must be informed promptly of the reason.

  • The police must inform a detainee of these rights and when informed it must be in a language that the person can understand.
  • Choose to, and consult with an attorney of his/her choice, and should such person not have the means to appoint an attorney of choice, to have a legal practitioner assigned by the state at the state’s expense and to be promptly informed of such rights.
  • Be contained in conditions that are consistent with human dignity, including at least exercise and the provision, at state expense, of adequate accommodation, nutrition, reading material and medical treatment.
  • Communicate with, and be visited by, the person’s spouse or partner, next of kin, chosen religious counsellor, and chosen medical practitioner.
  • Be presumed innocent until proven guilty. 

Police bail and warning

For minor offences ’police bail’ can be granted or the police may release a detainee on a warning. In the case of police bail, the investigating officer will propose an amount for bail and an agreement should then be reached on the amount of bail.

After payment of this amount the arrested person may be released from custody. There should always be an officer on duty of sufficient rank to make the decision to grant or refuse police bail.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your legal adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)




Over the past few months, we have seen videos being posted on social media of physical altercations, poor service delivery and racial slurs, but the victims of the videos and audible recordings are usually unaware that they are being recorded. The recordings are conducted without their permission and then shared. But is someone allowed to record you without being granted permission and the share those recordings?

Audio recording

Audio recording includes the recording of conversations conducted over the phone, recording someone speaking to a room full of people, and recording a direct conversation, without the other party’s permission. Recording without consent is against the law, unless

  • You are party to the communication;
  • You have written permission of one of the parties to the conversation;
  • The recording is in connection with the carrying on of business. 

Direct video recording

This is the recording of a person with whom you are having a face-to-face conversation. The video taping of someone without their consent is permissible because you are party to the conversation, much like audio recordings. Recording an altercation between you and someone else, or recording an altercation at an airport is legal due to where the conversation is occurring – a public place.

Section 4 of the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act 70 of 2002 (RICA) defines that a person is party to the conversation if they are in audible presence of the conversation. If you are in an altercation in a vicinity where other people can hear you, they are permitted to film because they are party to the altercation, therefore in direct communication with you.

Indirect video recording

Indirect communication is a much wider category, which includes data, speech and moving images. Skype conversations, although they appear to be face-to-face, are included as indirect communication because it is communication through an online telecommunications service. Thus, you would need to either be one of the parties in the engagement, or have been given consent from one of the parties to record the video/messages.

When is it illegal?

  • If the recording is through an interceptive method such as “bugging” or a “tapping” a device;
  • Hiding to spy on one of the parties for recording purposes, due to the parties being unaware of your presence;
  • When you are in no way party to the conversation. Being party to the conversation is if you are the sender, the recipient, or any person included in the communication.

Exception: RICA permits recordings carried out by law enforcement personnel in certain circumstances.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your legal adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)


Kevin Illes, A. (2017). Legal implications of secret recording. [online] Moneyweb. Available at: [Accessed 15 Jun. 2017].

Writer, S. and Writer, S. (2017). When you can – and can’t – legally record someone in South Africa. [online] Available at: [Accessed 15 Jun. 2017].



You decide to buy a fridge and a washing machine on Gumtree. It is important to note that there are several elements involved in this seemingly simple sale: (1) the sale agreement; (2) the transfer of ownership; (3) the risk of damage to the items; and (4) defects in the item.

(1) Sale Agreement

The law distinguishes between the contract of sale and the actual transfer of ownership. These two are treated as separate events in the overall transaction. The sale agreement is the underlying contract in terms of which the seller undertakes to transfer the property to the buyer in exchange for consideration. All the remedies under the law of contract are available here and it is in terms of the sale agreement where the buyer is afforded the most legal protection e.g. if the seller guarantees the washing machine will work for 3 years and it does not, then you can claim from the seller for breach of contract; or if the seller misrepresents that the washing machine is a front-loader when in fact it is a top-loader, the contract can be cancelled on the basis of misrepresentation and the goods and monies paid are to be returned. However, the agreement of sale does not on its own transfer property from the seller to the buyer.

(2) Transfer of Ownership

To pass ownership there must be delivery of the item and the intention to actually transfer ownership. In the case of a cash sale, the price must also be paid at the same time as delivery in order for ownership to transfer. In a credit sale, ownership passes on delivery and payment of the purchase price is postponed. In our law, ownership can be transferred if these requirements are met without a valid contract of sale. However, the buyer would have a claim against the seller in unjustified enrichment.

(3) Risk

A further element to consider is who bears the risk of damage or destruction to the property before it is delivered. Risk passes from the seller to the buyer when the sale agreement is ‘perfected’. This is when the price has been set; and the item be determined or identified. Any suspensive conditions must also be fulfilled. A suspensive condition suspends the operation of the contract until the happening of a future event e.g. I will sell the washing machine to you if my cousin does not buy it by Wednesday. The operation of this contract is suspended until Wednesday. Where damage takes place prior to the fulfilment of the suspensive condition, the seller bears the risk.

(4) Defects

Where there is a latent defect (one not visible upon reasonable inspection) then the buyer can ask for a reduction in the purchase price. Only where the item is so defective that it is not fit for its purpose and that a reasonable person would not have bought the item, can it be returned. This is the extent of a buyer’s remedies for latent defects. It is only where the seller is a professional seller (e.g. retail store trading in appliances) or a manufacturer, that the buyer claim for all losses e.g. the loss suffered where a faulty washing machine damaged clothing and the surrounding walls and cupboards.

However, where an item is sold ‘voetstoots’, it is sold in its condition ‘as is’. This voetstoots clause forms part of the sale agreement. Where such a clause is present, there is a duty on the buyer to properly inspect the property and ensure that there are no defects. If the buyer notices a defect later on, he will have no remedies available against the seller.


In most cases where you have entered into a sale and are dissatisfied with the outcome, the most extensive relief would be contractual remedies for breach of the sale agreement. However, it is important to establish whether risk has in fact transferred to you before you took delivery of the item. Furthermore, buyers should be cautious as to whether items are being sold ‘as is’, because such a clause leaves the buyer without any remedies where the item is defective. However, this voetstoots clause would not protect a seller who is acting fraudulently. Should you wish to know more, feel free to make an appointment with our offices.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your legal adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)



We are proud to anounce that we have appointed a new Conveyancer to join the team – Leigh Vencencie.


Leigh matriculated at The Settlers High School and completed her studies at the University of Cape Town, where she obtained her LLB degree in 2013.

She completed her articles of clerkship at Smuts & Co Attorneys and was admitted as an Attorney in February 2016 and Conveyancer in September 2017.

Leigh joined the MHI team as a Professional Assistant to Jurgens Tubb in September 2017 as well as being in charge of the bond department where she deals with instructions from the four major banks.

She has proved herself to be a meticulous worker with high standards and takes great pride in her work.

We look forward to introducing her to our clients.